Whatever happened to the "Bush lied on WMD's movement?"
Am I the only one keeping this alive?
posted by Centerline @ 12:23 PM
7 Comments
Slaying Wikiality
Outlet for the rants of a small group of misguided individuals.
Thursday, December 08, 2005
Contributors
Previous Posts
- Where is the democratic wing of the Democratic party?
- John Kerry said what?
- Is a mind a terrible thing to waste? Or is a waste...
- The "beyond the shadow of a doubt" standard....
- 50 years after Rosa Parks and there's not even a bus
- The official democratic position on Iraq
- Can we talk about job loss for 2005?
- Nym does New York
- Who are these people FOR anyway?
- The winds of change blow again
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
7 Comments:
Bush is having PR problems in so many areas that the dem's can afford to let that one go...
Everyone had to let this go because both parties were responsible for that debacle. To think that Congress did not have access to the same information as the White House is ridiculous. To continue to attack President Bush would bring similar attacks upon themselves for their own failures.
Although I think you are correct that both parties were responsible, I don't think that's why they stopped talking about it. They stopped because there is juicier stuff out there. Politicians rarely let a little thing like the truth get in the way of a good story.
What is juicier right now than WMD and lying? Lying is what got Clinton in trouble and the parallel is there for impeachment.
you mean McCain don't you? I don't see how the Democrats will be able to attack a war hero.
McCain v. Hillary.....smoke em while you got em.
$100 to anyone who wants to take the bet...McCain v. Everyone.
$100, eh? Now I know who you are... the betting gave it away
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home